FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

This is not really a wise move - even though you may be taking natural remedies that your oncologist does not understand, it still is a good idea to keep contact with them for frequent check-ups.

There may be times when you need a surgeon, particularly if you have a tumour in the gastrointestinal tract that may become inflamed and cause a blockage. Gallbladder cancer is an example where the bile ducts can become blocked. If you have jaundice (i.e. your skin turns yellow), it may be because of a tumor at the head of your pancreas that blocks the bile duct. Or there may be some other kind of obstruction of the bile duct. Work with your oncologist or surgeon to deal with the flow of bile. They may remove a tumor or put in a stent. If they put in a stent, it may become clogged, so watch for a return of your jaundice. Do NOT depend on alternative cancer treatments to work fast enough to relieve any blockage.

2. Do I monitor success of the therapy by the size of the tumour, which should inevitably shrink?

Most of the natural therapies on this site are mainly designed to kill cancer cells, not to shrink tumors. If you kill all of the cancer cells in a tumor, the tumor is harmless even if it still the same size as it was in the beginning! It takes about 2 months for Cesium high pH protocol to shrink tumors noticeably. The tumor eventually will shrink completely as therapy progresses, but it would be advisable not to worry about tumor size in the initial phases of treatment.

"Modern medicine," with its firm grasp of the art of making huge amounts of profits while their patients die, has totally brainwashed the public into thinking that the size of a tumour is important in a cancer treatment. Orthodox medicine shrinks tumours, then the patient dies. What is wrong with this picture? Here is a quote by Dr. Philip Binzel, M.D.:

• "When a patient is found to have a tumour, the only thing the doctor discusses with that patient is what he intends to do about the tumour. If a patient with a tumour is receiving radiation or chemotherapy, the only question that is asked is, "How is the tumour doing?" No one ever asks how the patient is doing. In my medical training, I remember well seeing patients who were getting radiation and/or chemotherapy. The tumour would get smaller and smaller, but the patient would be getting sicker and sicker. At autopsy we would hear, "Isn't that marvellous! The tumour is gone!" Yes, it was, but so was the patient. How many millions of times are we going to have to repeat these scenarios before we realize that we are treating the wrong thing?

  In primary cancer, with only a few exceptions, the tumor is neither health-endangering nor life-threatening. In primary cancer, with few exceptions, the tumour is neither health-endangering nor life-threatening. What is health-endangering and life-threatening is the spread of that disease through the rest of the body.

However, if a tumor is pressing on another organ, is blocking the flow of fluids, is a cause of extreme pain, is in a dangerous location, etc. it obviously would be wise to consult with a surgeon.